USCA vs VYM

Quick Verdict

VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.

Lower Fees: VYMHigher Returns: VYMMore Diversified: VYM

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricUSCAVYMWinner
Expense Ratio0.07%0.04%
AUM$3.4B$79.0B
Dividend Yield1.14%2.86%
Holdings273568
YTD Return+10.31%+15.45%
1Y Return+17.24%+26.05%
3Y Return (annualized)+19.40%+17.96%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.54%
Volatility (annualized)12.8%14.6%
Max Drawdown-19.1%-58.8%
Fund FamilyXtrackers ETFsVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionApr 4, 2023Nov 10, 2006

USCA vs VYM Performance

Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF (USCA) is a ETF from Xtrackers ETFs and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year USCA returned +17.24% while VYM returned +26.05%. Year to date, USCA is up 10.31% versus a gain of 15.45% for VYM.

Over three years, USCA compounded at +19.40% per year against +17.96% for VYM. Across the full 3-year window we track, USCA has the edge at +21.48% annualized vs +7.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.6% compared with 12.8% for USCA. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.1% for USCA and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.72. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

USCA charges 0.07% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $7 vs $4 annually, a gap of $3 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, USCA currently yields 1.14% against 2.86% for VYM.

Holdings Overlap

30.8%overlap

USCA and VYM share 175 holdings out of 788 unique holdings combined, representing a 30.8% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in USCAWeight in VYMDifference
AVGO3.29%6.47%3.18%
JPM1.36%3.36%2.00%
JNJ1.21%2.62%1.41%
XOMProProPro
WMTProProPro
ABBVProProPro
PGProProPro
HDProProPro
CSCOProProPro
CATProProPro
See all 10 holdings USCA shares with VYM
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, USCA or VYM?

USCA has an expense ratio of 0.07% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $3 per year of difference.

Which performed better, USCA or VYM?

Over the past year USCA returned +17.24% vs +26.05% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), USCA annualized +21.48% vs +7.06% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, USCA or VYM?

VYM has been the more volatile fund at 14.6% annualized versus 12.8% for USCA. Worst drawdown: USCA -19.1% vs VYM -58.8%.

Should I hold both USCA and VYM?

USCA and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.72, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between USCA and VYM?

USCA and VYM share 175 common holdings with a 30.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 788 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, USCA or VYM?

USCA yields 1.14% while VYM yields 2.86%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →