USCA vs VOO

Quick Verdict

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.

Lower Fees: VOOHigher Returns: VOOMore Diversified: VOO

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricUSCAVOOWinner
Expense Ratio0.07%0.03%
AUM$3.4B$979.0B
Dividend Yield1.14%1.09%
Holdings273509
YTD Return+10.31%+13.31%
1Y Return+17.24%+24.01%
3Y Return (annualized)+19.40%+21.17%
5Y Return (annualized)-+13.34%
Volatility (annualized)12.8%14.1%
Max Drawdown-19.1%-34.3%
Fund FamilyXtrackers ETFsVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionApr 4, 2023Sep 7, 2010

USCA vs VOO Performance

Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF (USCA) is a ETF from Xtrackers ETFs and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year USCA returned +17.24% while VOO returned +24.01%. Year to date, USCA is up 10.31% versus a gain of 13.31% for VOO.

Over three years, USCA compounded at +19.40% per year against +21.17% for VOO. Across the full 3-year window we track, USCA has the edge at +21.48% annualized vs +13.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 12.8% for USCA. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.1% for USCA and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.98. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

USCA charges 0.07% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $7 vs $3 annually, a gap of $4 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, USCA currently yields 1.14% against 1.09% for VOO.

Holdings Overlap

82.4%overlap

USCA and VOO share 363 holdings out of 547 unique holdings combined, representing a 82.4% weight overlap.

High overlap means holding both may not provide much additional diversification.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in USCAWeight in VOODifference
NVDA9.16%7.51%1.65%
AAPL9.38%6.59%2.79%
MSFT5.17%4.30%0.87%
AMZNProProPro
GOOGLProProPro
AVGOProProPro
GOOGProProPro
METAProProPro
TSLAProProPro
LLYProProPro
See all 10 holdings USCA shares with VOO
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, USCA or VOO?

USCA has an expense ratio of 0.07% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $4 per year of difference.

Which performed better, USCA or VOO?

Over the past year USCA returned +17.24% vs +24.01% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), USCA annualized +21.48% vs +13.55% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, USCA or VOO?

VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 12.8% for USCA. Worst drawdown: USCA -19.1% vs VOO -34.3%.

Should I hold both USCA and VOO?

USCA and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.98, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.

What is the holdings overlap between USCA and VOO?

USCA and VOO share 363 common holdings with a 82.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 547 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, USCA or VOO?

USCA yields 1.14% while VOO yields 1.09%, so USCA currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →