ULVM vs VTI

Quick Verdict

VTI has a lower expense ratio. ULVM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns: ULVMMore Diversified: VTI

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricULVMVTIWinner
Expense Ratio0.20%0.03%
AUM$266M$663.5B
Dividend Yield1.63%1.07%
Holdings1273,543
YTD Return+19.54%+13.39%
1Y Return+30.01%+23.21%
3Y Return (annualized)+21.08%+20.65%
5Y Return (annualized)+12.44%+12.18%
Volatility (annualized)17.0%15.3%
Max Drawdown-40.8%-56.6%
Fund FamilyVictory Capital Management Inc.Vanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionOct 24, 2017May 24, 2001

ULVM vs VTI Performance

VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF (ULVM) is a ETF from Victory Capital Management Inc. and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ULVM returned +30.01% while VTI returned +23.21%. Year to date, ULVM is up 19.54% versus a gain of 13.39% for VTI.

Over three years, ULVM compounded at +21.08% per year against +20.65% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +12.44% and +12.18% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, ULVM has the edge at +10.57% annualized vs +8.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

ULVM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.0% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -40.8% for ULVM and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.93. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

ULVM charges 0.20% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $20 vs $3 annually, a gap of $17 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ULVM currently yields 1.63% against 1.07% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

14.0%overlap

ULVM and VTI share 116 holdings out of 2791 unique holdings combined, representing a 14.0% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in ULVMWeight in VTIDifference
GOOGL0.64%2.88%2.24%
BRK.B1.61%1.24%0.37%
JNJ1.59%0.84%0.75%
MUProProPro
XOMProProPro
BACProProPro
OProProPro
CBProProPro
LProProPro
ATOProProPro
See all 10 holdings ULVM shares with VTI
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, ULVM or VTI?

ULVM has an expense ratio of 0.20% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $17 per year of difference.

Which performed better, ULVM or VTI?

Over the past year ULVM returned +30.01% vs +23.21% for VTI, so ULVM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), ULVM annualized +10.57% vs +8.11% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, ULVM or VTI?

ULVM has been the more volatile fund at 17.0% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: ULVM -40.8% vs VTI -56.6%.

Should I hold both ULVM and VTI?

ULVM and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.93, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.

What is the holdings overlap between ULVM and VTI?

ULVM and VTI share 116 common holdings with a 14.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2791 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, ULVM or VTI?

ULVM yields 1.63% while VTI yields 1.07%, so ULVM currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →