TGLB vs VTI
TGLB vs VTI
T. Rowe Price Global Equity ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | TGLB | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.46% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | - | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | - | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 347 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +16.84% | +14.20% | |
| 1Y Return | +20.40% | +24.16% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.12% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.37% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.5% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -9.8% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | T.Rowe Price | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 25, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
TGLB vs VTI Performance
T. Rowe Price Global Equity ETF (TGLB) is a ETF from T.Rowe Price and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year TGLB returned +20.40% while VTI returned +24.16%. Year to date, TGLB is up 16.84% versus a gain of 14.20% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 12.5% for TGLB. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -9.8% for TGLB and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.94. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
TGLB charges 0.46% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $46 vs $3 annually, a gap of $43 per year that compounds over a long holding period.
Holdings Overlap
TGLB and VTI share 1 holdings out of 2944 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in TGLB | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| VST | 0.04% | 0.07% | 0.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, TGLB or VTI?
TGLB has an expense ratio of 0.46% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $43 per year of difference.
Which performed better, TGLB or VTI?
Over the past year TGLB returned +20.40% vs +24.16% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), TGLB annualized +18.72% vs +8.14% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, TGLB or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 12.5% for TGLB. Worst drawdown: TGLB -9.8% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both TGLB and VTI?
TGLB and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.94, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between TGLB and VTI?
TGLB and VTI share 1 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2944 unique securities.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.