IVV vs TGLB
IVV vs TGLB
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs T. Rowe Price Global Equity ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | TGLB | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.46% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | - | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | - | |
| Holdings | 508 | 347 | |
| YTD Return | +13.31% | +16.20% | |
| 1Y Return | +24.00% | +19.50% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.16% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.34% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 12.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -9.8% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | T.Rowe Price | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jun 25, 2025 |
IVV vs TGLB Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and T. Rowe Price Global Equity ETF (TGLB) is a ETF from T.Rowe Price. Over the past year IVV returned +24.00% while TGLB returned +19.50%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.31% versus a gain of 16.20% for TGLB.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 12.4% for TGLB. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -9.8% for TGLB. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.94. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while TGLB charges 0.46%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $46 annually, a gap of $43 per year that compounds over a long holding period.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and TGLB share 1 holdings out of 666 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in TGLB | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| VST | 0.08% | 0.04% | 0.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or TGLB?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while TGLB charges 0.46%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $43 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or TGLB?
Over the past year IVV returned +24.00% vs +19.50% for TGLB, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), IVV annualized +7.03% vs +18.23% for TGLB. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or TGLB?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 12.4% for TGLB. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs TGLB -9.8%.
Should I hold both IVV and TGLB?
IVV and TGLB have a monthly-return correlation of 0.94, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and TGLB?
IVV and TGLB share 1 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 666 unique securities.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.