TBFG vs VYM
TBFG vs VYM
The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | TBFG | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.46% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $379M | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.38% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 28 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | +10.47% | +15.57% | |
| 1Y Return | +20.30% | +25.99% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +18.02% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.71% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 9.3% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -14.2% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Brinsmere Fund | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Allocation/Balanced | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 12, 2024 | Nov 10, 2006 |
TBFG vs VYM Performance
The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF (TBFG) is a ETF from Brinsmere Fund and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year TBFG returned +20.30% while VYM returned +25.99%. Year to date, TBFG is up 10.47% versus a gain of 15.57% for VYM.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.6% compared with 9.3% for TBFG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -14.2% for TBFG and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.81. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
TBFG charges 0.46% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $46 vs $4 annually, a gap of $42 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, TBFG currently yields 2.38% against 2.86% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
TBFG and VYM share 0 holdings out of 585 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, TBFG or VYM?
TBFG has an expense ratio of 0.46% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $42 per year of difference.
Which performed better, TBFG or VYM?
Over the past year TBFG returned +20.30% vs +25.99% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), TBFG annualized +13.74% vs +7.07% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, TBFG or VYM?
VYM has been the more volatile fund at 14.6% annualized versus 9.3% for TBFG. Worst drawdown: TBFG -14.2% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both TBFG and VYM?
TBFG and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.81, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between TBFG and VYM?
TBFG and VYM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 585 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, TBFG or VYM?
TBFG yields 2.38% while VYM yields 2.86%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.