TBFG vs VOO
TBFG vs VOO
The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | TBFG | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.46% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $379M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.38% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 28 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +8.87% | +11.51% | |
| 1Y Return | +18.56% | +21.46% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.86% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 9.3% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -14.2% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Brinsmere Fund | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Allocation/Balanced | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 12, 2024 | Sep 7, 2010 |
TBFG vs VOO Performance
The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF (TBFG) is a ETF from Brinsmere Fund and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year TBFG returned +18.56% while VOO returned +21.46%. Year to date, TBFG is up 8.87% versus a gain of 11.51% for VOO.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 9.3% for TBFG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -14.2% for TBFG and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.90. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
TBFG charges 0.46% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $46 vs $3 annually, a gap of $43 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, TBFG currently yields 2.38% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
TBFG and VOO share 1 holdings out of 531 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in TBFG | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| VEA | 1.18% | 0.01% | 1.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, TBFG or VOO?
TBFG has an expense ratio of 0.46% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $43 per year of difference.
Which performed better, TBFG or VOO?
Over the past year TBFG returned +18.56% vs +21.46% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), TBFG annualized +13.10% vs +13.44% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, TBFG or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 9.3% for TBFG. Worst drawdown: TBFG -14.2% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both TBFG and VOO?
TBFG and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.90, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between TBFG and VOO?
TBFG and VOO share 1 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 531 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, TBFG or VOO?
TBFG yields 2.38% while VOO yields 1.09%, so TBFG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.