TBFG vs VXUS
TBFG vs VXUS
The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7860 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | TBFG | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.46% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $379M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.38% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 28 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +10.47% | +13.57% | |
| 1Y Return | +20.30% | +28.78% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +18.63% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.05% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 9.3% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -14.2% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Brinsmere Fund | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Allocation/Balanced | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 12, 2024 | Jan 26, 2011 |
TBFG vs VXUS Performance
The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF (TBFG) is a ETF from Brinsmere Fund and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year TBFG returned +20.30% while VXUS returned +28.78%. Year to date, TBFG is up 10.47% versus a gain of 13.57% for VXUS.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VXUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 9.3% for TBFG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -14.2% for TBFG and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.83. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
TBFG charges 0.46% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $46 vs $5 annually, a gap of $41 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, TBFG currently yields 2.38% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
TBFG and VXUS share 0 holdings out of 7887 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, TBFG or VXUS?
TBFG has an expense ratio of 0.46% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $41 per year of difference.
Which performed better, TBFG or VXUS?
Over the past year TBFG returned +20.30% vs +28.78% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), TBFG annualized +13.74% vs +4.80% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, TBFG or VXUS?
VXUS has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 9.3% for TBFG. Worst drawdown: TBFG -14.2% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both TBFG and VXUS?
TBFG and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.83, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between TBFG and VXUS?
TBFG and VXUS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7887 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, TBFG or VXUS?
TBFG yields 2.38% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.