IVV vs TBFG
IVV vs TBFG
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | TBFG | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.46% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $379M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 2.38% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 28 | |
| YTD Return | +13.52% | +10.47% | |
| 1Y Return | +23.63% | +20.30% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.26% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.52% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 9.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -14.2% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Brinsmere Fund | |
| Category | Equity | Allocation/Balanced | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jan 12, 2024 |
IVV vs TBFG Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF (TBFG) is a ETF from Brinsmere Fund. Over the past year IVV returned +23.63% while TBFG returned +20.30%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.52% versus a gain of 10.47% for TBFG.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 9.3% for TBFG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -14.2% for TBFG. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.90. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while TBFG charges 0.46%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $46 annually, a gap of $43 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 2.38% for TBFG.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and TBFG share 0 holdings out of 532 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or TBFG?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while TBFG charges 0.46%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $43 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or TBFG?
Over the past year IVV returned +23.63% vs +20.30% for TBFG, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), IVV annualized +7.04% vs +13.74% for TBFG. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or TBFG?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 9.3% for TBFG. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs TBFG -14.2%.
Should I hold both IVV and TBFG?
IVV and TBFG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.90, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and TBFG?
IVV and TBFG share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 532 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or TBFG?
IVV yields 1.09% while TBFG yields 2.38%, so TBFG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.