SSO vs VTI

Quick Verdict

VTI has a lower expense ratio. SSO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns: SSOMore Diversified: VTI

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricSSOVTIWinner
Expense Ratio0.87%0.03%
AUM$7.7B$663.5B
Dividend Yield0.67%1.07%
Holdings5213,543
YTD Return+15.78%+10.14%
1Y Return+32.80%+19.82%
3Y Return (annualized)+30.69%+18.94%
5Y Return (annualized)+17.21%+11.79%
Volatility (annualized)31.2%15.4%
Max Drawdown-85.5%-56.6%
Fund FamilyProSharesVanguard (US)
CategoryAlternativeEquity
InceptionJun 19, 2006May 24, 2001

SSO vs VTI Performance

ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) is a ETF from ProShares and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SSO returned +32.80% while VTI returned +19.82%. Year to date, SSO is up 15.78% versus a gain of 10.14% for VTI.

Over three years, SSO compounded at +30.69% per year against +18.94% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +17.21% and +11.79% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, SSO has the edge at +14.56% annualized vs +7.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

SSO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 31.2% compared with 15.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -85.5% for SSO and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.99. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

SSO charges 0.87% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $87 vs $3 annually, a gap of $84 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SSO currently yields 0.67% against 1.07% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

65.8%overlap

SSO and VTI share 457 holdings out of 2830 unique holdings combined, representing a 65.8% weight overlap.

High overlap means holding both may not provide much additional diversification.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in SSOWeight in VTIDifference
NVDA4.99%6.32%1.33%
AAPL4.84%5.84%1.00%
MSFT3.03%3.81%0.78%
AMZNProProPro
GOOGLProProPro
AVGOProProPro
GOOGProProPro
METAProProPro
MUProProPro
TSLAProProPro
See all 10 holdings SSO shares with VTI
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, SSO or VTI?

SSO has an expense ratio of 0.87% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $84 per year of difference.

Which performed better, SSO or VTI?

Over the past year SSO returned +32.80% vs +19.82% for VTI, so SSO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), SSO annualized +14.56% vs +7.99% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, SSO or VTI?

SSO has been the more volatile fund at 31.2% annualized versus 15.4% for VTI. Worst drawdown: SSO -85.5% vs VTI -56.6%.

Should I hold both SSO and VTI?

SSO and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.99, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.

What is the holdings overlap between SSO and VTI?

SSO and VTI share 457 common holdings with a 65.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2830 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, SSO or VTI?

SSO yields 0.67% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →