SSO vs VYM

Quick Verdict

VYM has a lower expense ratio. SSO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.

Lower Fees: VYMHigher Returns: SSOMore Diversified: VYM

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricSSOVYMWinner
Expense Ratio0.87%0.04%
AUM$7.7B$79.0B
Dividend Yield0.67%2.86%
Holdings521568
YTD Return+22.92%+15.45%
1Y Return+42.95%+26.05%
3Y Return (annualized)+34.55%+17.96%
5Y Return (annualized)+18.16%+12.54%
Volatility (annualized)31.1%14.6%
Max Drawdown-85.5%-58.8%
Fund FamilyProSharesVanguard (US)
CategoryAlternativeEquity
InceptionJun 19, 2006Nov 10, 2006

SSO vs VYM Performance

ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) is a ETF from ProShares and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SSO returned +42.95% while VYM returned +26.05%. Year to date, SSO is up 22.92% versus a gain of 15.45% for VYM.

Over three years, SSO compounded at +34.55% per year against +17.96% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +18.16% and +12.54% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, SSO has the edge at +14.89% annualized vs +7.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

SSO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 31.1% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -85.5% for SSO and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.92. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

SSO charges 0.87% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $87 vs $4 annually, a gap of $83 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SSO currently yields 0.67% against 2.86% for VYM.

Holdings Overlap

22.1%overlap

SSO and VYM share 222 holdings out of 840 unique holdings combined, representing a 22.1% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in SSOWeight in VYMDifference
AVGO1.87%6.47%4.60%
JPM0.95%3.36%2.41%
XOM0.60%2.83%2.23%
JNJProProPro
WMTProProPro
ABBVProProPro
HDProProPro
CATProProPro
CVXProProPro
CSCOProProPro
See all 10 holdings SSO shares with VYM
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, SSO or VYM?

SSO has an expense ratio of 0.87% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $83 per year of difference.

Which performed better, SSO or VYM?

Over the past year SSO returned +42.95% vs +26.05% for VYM, so SSO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), SSO annualized +14.89% vs +7.06% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, SSO or VYM?

SSO has been the more volatile fund at 31.1% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: SSO -85.5% vs VYM -58.8%.

Should I hold both SSO and VYM?

SSO and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.92, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.

What is the holdings overlap between SSO and VYM?

SSO and VYM share 222 common holdings with a 22.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 840 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, SSO or VYM?

SSO yields 0.67% while VYM yields 2.86%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →