SECT vs VTI
SECT vs VTI
Main Sector Rotation ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SECT | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.69% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $2.8B | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.72% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 14 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +12.86% | +14.20% | |
| 1Y Return | +24.09% | +24.16% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.97% | +21.12% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.37% | +12.37% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.2% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -50.1% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Main Management ETF Advisors, LLC | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 5, 2017 | May 24, 2001 |
SECT vs VTI Performance
Main Sector Rotation ETF (SECT) is a ETF from Main Management ETF Advisors, LLC and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SECT returned +24.09% while VTI returned +24.16%. Year to date, SECT is up 12.86% versus a gain of 14.20% for VTI.
Over three years, SECT compounded at +18.97% per year against +21.12% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +12.37% and +12.37% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.14% annualized vs +7.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SECT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.2% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -50.1% for SECT and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.76. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SECT charges 0.69% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $69 vs $3 annually, a gap of $66 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SECT currently yields 0.72% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
SECT and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2793 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SECT or VTI?
SECT has an expense ratio of 0.69% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $66 per year of difference.
Which performed better, SECT or VTI?
Over the past year SECT returned +24.09% vs +24.16% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), SECT annualized +7.21% vs +8.14% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, SECT or VTI?
SECT has been the more volatile fund at 20.2% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: SECT -50.1% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both SECT and VTI?
SECT and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.76, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between SECT and VTI?
SECT and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2793 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, SECT or VTI?
SECT yields 0.72% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.