SECT vs VOO
SECT vs VOO
Main Sector Rotation ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. SECT delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SECT | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.69% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $2.8B | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.72% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 14 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +12.86% | +13.80% | |
| 1Y Return | +24.09% | +23.71% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.97% | +21.50% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.37% | +13.44% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.2% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -50.1% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Main Management ETF Advisors, LLC | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 5, 2017 | Sep 7, 2010 |
SECT vs VOO Performance
Main Sector Rotation ETF (SECT) is a ETF from Main Management ETF Advisors, LLC and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SECT returned +24.09% while VOO returned +23.71%. Year to date, SECT is up 12.86% versus a gain of 13.80% for VOO.
Over three years, SECT compounded at +18.97% per year against +21.50% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +12.37% and +13.44% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.58% annualized vs +7.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SECT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.2% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -50.1% for SECT and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.76. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SECT charges 0.69% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $69 vs $3 annually, a gap of $66 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SECT currently yields 0.72% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
SECT and VOO share 0 holdings out of 515 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SECT or VOO?
SECT has an expense ratio of 0.69% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $66 per year of difference.
Which performed better, SECT or VOO?
Over the past year SECT returned +24.09% vs +23.71% for VOO, so SECT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), SECT annualized +7.21% vs +13.58% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, SECT or VOO?
SECT has been the more volatile fund at 20.2% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: SECT -50.1% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both SECT and VOO?
SECT and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.76, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between SECT and VOO?
SECT and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 515 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, SECT or VOO?
SECT yields 0.72% while VOO yields 1.09%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.