SDVD vs VTI

Quick Verdict

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns: VTIMore Diversified: VTI

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricSDVDVTIWinner
Expense Ratio0.85%0.03%
AUM$886M$663.5B
Dividend Yield8.25%1.07%
Holdings1683,543
YTD Return+12.11%+13.39%
1Y Return+19.65%+23.21%
3Y Return (annualized)+6.30%+20.65%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.18%
Volatility (annualized)22.4%15.3%
Max Drawdown-29.1%-56.6%
Fund FamilyFirst Trust Portfolios (US)Vanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionAug 9, 2023May 24, 2001

SDVD vs VTI Performance

FT Vest SMID Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF (SDVD) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SDVD returned +19.65% while VTI returned +23.21%. Year to date, SDVD is up 12.11% versus a gain of 13.39% for VTI.

Over three years, SDVD compounded at +6.30% per year against +20.65% for VTI. Across the full 3-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.11% annualized vs +6.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

SDVD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.4% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -29.1% for SDVD and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.70. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

SDVD charges 0.85% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $3 annually, a gap of $82 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SDVD currently yields 8.25% against 1.07% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

1.9%overlap

SDVD and VTI share 131 holdings out of 2825 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.9% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in SDVDWeight in VTIDifference
FIX1.09%0.10%0.99%
PSMT1.12%0.00%1.12%
WWD1.08%0.03%1.05%
IBKRProProPro
IPARProProPro
OFG:PRProProPro
ZIONProProPro
WSMProProPro
THGProProPro
PRIProProPro
See all 10 holdings SDVD shares with VTI
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, SDVD or VTI?

SDVD has an expense ratio of 0.85% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $82 per year of difference.

Which performed better, SDVD or VTI?

Over the past year SDVD returned +19.65% vs +23.21% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), SDVD annualized +6.30% vs +8.11% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, SDVD or VTI?

SDVD has been the more volatile fund at 22.4% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: SDVD -29.1% vs VTI -56.6%.

Should I hold both SDVD and VTI?

SDVD and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.70, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between SDVD and VTI?

SDVD and VTI share 131 common holdings with a 1.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2825 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, SDVD or VTI?

SDVD yields 8.25% while VTI yields 1.07%, so SDVD currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →