SDVD vs VOO

Quick Verdict

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.

Lower Fees: VOOHigher Returns: VOOMore Diversified: VOO

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricSDVDVOOWinner
Expense Ratio0.85%0.03%
AUM$886M$979.0B
Dividend Yield8.25%1.09%
Holdings168509
YTD Return+12.11%+13.11%
1Y Return+19.65%+22.88%
3Y Return (annualized)+6.30%+21.08%
5Y Return (annualized)-+13.26%
Volatility (annualized)22.4%14.1%
Max Drawdown-29.1%-34.3%
Fund FamilyFirst Trust Portfolios (US)Vanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionAug 9, 2023Sep 7, 2010

SDVD vs VOO Performance

FT Vest SMID Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF (SDVD) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SDVD returned +19.65% while VOO returned +22.88%. Year to date, SDVD is up 12.11% versus a gain of 13.11% for VOO.

Over three years, SDVD compounded at +6.30% per year against +21.08% for VOO. Across the full 3-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.54% annualized vs +6.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

SDVD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.4% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -29.1% for SDVD and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.66. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.

Fees and Cost Over Time

SDVD charges 0.85% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $3 annually, a gap of $82 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SDVD currently yields 8.25% against 1.09% for VOO.

Holdings Overlap

1.6%overlap

SDVD and VOO share 40 holdings out of 638 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.6% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in SDVDWeight in VOODifference
FIX1.09%0.11%0.98%
IBKR1.06%0.06%1.00%
AIZ0.98%0.02%0.96%
WSMProProPro
CINFProProPro
SNAProProPro
EMEProProPro
VRSNProProPro
RLProProPro
SYFProProPro
See all 10 holdings SDVD shares with VOO
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, SDVD or VOO?

SDVD has an expense ratio of 0.85% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $82 per year of difference.

Which performed better, SDVD or VOO?

Over the past year SDVD returned +19.65% vs +22.88% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), SDVD annualized +6.30% vs +13.54% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, SDVD or VOO?

SDVD has been the more volatile fund at 22.4% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: SDVD -29.1% vs VOO -34.3%.

Should I hold both SDVD and VOO?

SDVD and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.66, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between SDVD and VOO?

SDVD and VOO share 40 common holdings with a 1.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 638 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, SDVD or VOO?

SDVD yields 8.25% while VOO yields 1.09%, so SDVD currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →