SBI vs VTI
SBI vs VTI
Western Asset Intermediate Muni Fund Inc vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SBI | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.29% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $117M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 5.94% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 270 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +3.31% | +14.20% | |
| 1Y Return | +7.39% | +24.16% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +6.88% | +21.12% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +0.15% | +12.37% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 9.2% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -46.0% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Tax Preferred | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 2, 1992 | May 24, 2001 |
SBI vs VTI Performance
Western Asset Intermediate Muni Fund Inc (SBI) is a ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SBI returned +7.39% while VTI returned +24.16%. Year to date, SBI is up 3.31% versus a gain of 14.20% for VTI.
Over three years, SBI compounded at +6.88% per year against +21.12% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +0.15% and +12.37% respectively. Across the full 25-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.14% annualized vs -0.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 9.2% for SBI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -46.0% for SBI and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.23. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SBI charges 1.29% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $129 vs $3 annually, a gap of $126 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SBI currently yields 5.94% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
SBI and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2931 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SBI or VTI?
SBI has an expense ratio of 1.29% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $126 per year of difference.
Which performed better, SBI or VTI?
Over the past year SBI returned +7.39% vs +24.16% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (25 years), SBI annualized -0.16% vs +8.14% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, SBI or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 9.2% for SBI. Worst drawdown: SBI -46.0% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both SBI and VTI?
SBI and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.23, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between SBI and VTI?
SBI and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2931 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, SBI or VTI?
SBI yields 5.94% while VTI yields 1.07%, so SBI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.