QQQ vs SBI
QQQ vs SBI
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs Western Asset Intermediate Muni Fund Inc
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. SBI offers more diversification with 148 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | SBI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 1.29% | |
| AUM | $455.8B | $117M | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.41% | 5.94% | |
| Holdings | 108 | 270 | |
| YTD Return | +18.20% | +3.31% | |
| 1Y Return | +27.63% | +7.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.54% | +6.88% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +15.12% | +0.15% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 30.6% | 9.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -83.0% | -46.0% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Tax Preferred | |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Mar 2, 1992 |
QQQ vs SBI Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Western Asset Intermediate Muni Fund Inc (SBI) is a ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US). Over the past year QQQ returned +27.63% while SBI returned +7.39%. Year to date, QQQ is up 18.20% versus a gain of 3.31% for SBI.
Over three years, QQQ compounded at +25.54% per year against +6.88% for SBI; over five years the annualized figures are +15.12% and +0.15% respectively. Across the full 27-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.11% annualized vs -0.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 9.2% for SBI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -83.0% for QQQ and -46.0% for SBI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.09. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while SBI charges 1.29%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $129 annually, a gap of $111 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.41% against 5.94% for SBI.
Holdings Overlap
QQQ and SBI share 0 holdings out of 251 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or SBI?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while SBI charges 1.29%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $111 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QQQ or SBI?
Over the past year QQQ returned +27.63% vs +7.39% for SBI, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (27 years), QQQ annualized +13.11% vs -0.16% for SBI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QQQ or SBI?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 9.2% for SBI. Worst drawdown: QQQ -83.0% vs SBI -46.0%.
Should I hold both QQQ and SBI?
QQQ and SBI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.09, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and SBI?
QQQ and SBI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 251 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or SBI?
QQQ yields 0.41% while SBI yields 5.94%, so SBI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.