RWL vs VTI
RWL vs VTI
Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. RWL delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RWL | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $9.6B | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.26% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 505 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +17.00% | +13.92% | |
| 1Y Return | +31.75% | +24.07% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.29% | +20.88% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.21% | +12.47% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.5% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -55.3% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 19, 2008 | May 24, 2001 |
RWL vs VTI Performance
Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF (RWL) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RWL returned +31.75% while VTI returned +24.07%. Year to date, RWL is up 17.00% versus a gain of 13.92% for VTI.
Over three years, RWL compounded at +19.29% per year against +20.88% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +14.21% and +12.47% respectively. Across the full 18-year window we track, RWL has the edge at +10.09% annualized vs +8.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RWL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.5% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -55.3% for RWL and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.95. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RWL charges 0.39% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $3 annually, a gap of $36 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RWL currently yields 1.26% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
RWL and VTI share 453 holdings out of 2820 unique holdings combined, representing a 49.7% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in RWL | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AAPL | 2.23% | 5.84% | 3.61% |
| NVDA | 1.26% | 6.32% | 5.06% |
| AMZN | 3.83% | 3.17% | 0.66% |
| MSFT | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| WMT | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| GOOGL | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| GOOG | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| UNH | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| AVGO | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| META | Pro | Pro | Pro |
See all 10 holdings RWL shares with VTI Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position. Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime. | |||
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RWL or VTI?
RWL has an expense ratio of 0.39% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $36 per year of difference.
Which performed better, RWL or VTI?
Over the past year RWL returned +31.75% vs +24.07% for VTI, so RWL leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (18 years), RWL annualized +10.09% vs +8.13% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, RWL or VTI?
RWL has been the more volatile fund at 16.5% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: RWL -55.3% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both RWL and VTI?
RWL and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.95, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between RWL and VTI?
RWL and VTI share 453 common holdings with a 49.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2820 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, RWL or VTI?
RWL yields 1.26% while VTI yields 1.07%, so RWL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.