RWL vs VYM
RWL vs VYM
Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. RWL delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RWL | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $9.6B | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.26% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 505 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | +16.94% | +15.45% | |
| 1Y Return | +31.27% | +26.05% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.25% | +17.96% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.18% | +12.54% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.5% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -55.3% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 19, 2008 | Nov 10, 2006 |
RWL vs VYM Performance
Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF (RWL) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RWL returned +31.27% while VYM returned +26.05%. Year to date, RWL is up 16.94% versus a gain of 15.45% for VYM.
Over three years, RWL compounded at +19.25% per year against +17.96% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +14.18% and +12.54% respectively. Across the full 19-year window we track, RWL has the edge at +10.09% annualized vs +7.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RWL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.5% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -55.3% for RWL and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.96. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RWL charges 0.39% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $4 annually, a gap of $35 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RWL currently yields 1.26% against 2.86% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
RWL and VYM share 220 holdings out of 828 unique holdings combined, representing a 39.6% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in RWL | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AVGO | 0.39% | 6.47% | 6.08% |
| WMT | 3.52% | 2.44% | 1.08% |
| JPM | 1.55% | 3.36% | 1.81% |
| XOM | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| UNH | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| JNJ | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| CVS | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| HD | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| CVX | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| PG | Pro | Pro | Pro |
See all 10 holdings RWL shares with VYM Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position. Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime. | |||
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RWL or VYM?
RWL has an expense ratio of 0.39% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $35 per year of difference.
Which performed better, RWL or VYM?
Over the past year RWL returned +31.27% vs +26.05% for VYM, so RWL leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (19 years), RWL annualized +10.09% vs +7.06% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, RWL or VYM?
RWL has been the more volatile fund at 16.5% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: RWL -55.3% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both RWL and VYM?
RWL and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.96, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between RWL and VYM?
RWL and VYM share 220 common holdings with a 39.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 828 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, RWL or VYM?
RWL yields 1.26% while VYM yields 2.86%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.