RAA vs VTI

Quick Verdict

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns: VTIMore Diversified: VTI

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricRAAVTIWinner
Expense Ratio0.85%0.03%
AUM$594M$663.5B
Dividend Yield2.13%1.07%
Holdings1823,543
YTD Return+7.15%+11.83%
1Y Return+15.49%+21.79%
3Y Return (annualized)+13.79%+20.40%
5Y Return (annualized)+13.79%+11.96%
Volatility (annualized)23.4%15.3%
Max Drawdown-53.8%-56.6%
Fund Family3FourteenSMIVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionFeb 26, 2025May 24, 2001

RAA vs VTI Performance

SMI 3Fourteen REAL Asset Allocation ETF (RAA) is a ETF from 3FourteenSMI and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RAA returned +15.49% while VTI returned +21.79%. Year to date, RAA is up 7.15% versus a gain of 11.83% for VTI.

Over three years, RAA compounded at +13.79% per year against +20.40% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +13.79% and +11.96% respectively. Across the full 25-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.06% annualized vs +7.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

RAA has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 23.4% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -53.8% for RAA and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.01. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.

Fees and Cost Over Time

RAA charges 0.85% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $3 annually, a gap of $82 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RAA currently yields 2.13% against 1.07% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

21.4%overlap

RAA and VTI share 134 holdings out of 2829 unique holdings combined, representing a 21.4% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in RAAWeight in VTIDifference
NVDA1.61%6.32%4.71%
AAPL1.39%5.84%4.45%
MSFT1.04%3.81%2.77%
AMZNProProPro
GOOGLProProPro
AVGOProProPro
GOOGProProPro
METAProProPro
TSLAProProPro
MUProProPro
See all 10 holdings RAA shares with VTI
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, RAA or VTI?

RAA has an expense ratio of 0.85% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $82 per year of difference.

Which performed better, RAA or VTI?

Over the past year RAA returned +15.49% vs +21.79% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (25 years), RAA annualized +7.18% vs +8.06% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, RAA or VTI?

RAA has been the more volatile fund at 23.4% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: RAA -53.8% vs VTI -56.6%.

Should I hold both RAA and VTI?

RAA and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.01, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between RAA and VTI?

RAA and VTI share 134 common holdings with a 21.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2829 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, RAA or VTI?

RAA yields 2.13% while VTI yields 1.07%, so RAA currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →