QQQH vs VYM

Quick Verdict

VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.

Lower Fees: VYMHigher Returns: VYMMore Diversified: VYM

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricQQQHVYMWinner
Expense Ratio0.68%0.04%
AUM$375M$79.0B
Dividend Yield9.56%2.86%
Holdings106568
YTD Return+6.76%+15.80%
1Y Return+12.86%+26.12%
3Y Return (annualized)+18.45%+18.25%
5Y Return (annualized)+7.79%+12.51%
Volatility (annualized)13.2%14.6%
Max Drawdown-31.2%-58.8%
Fund FamilyNEOSVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionNov 8, 2024Nov 10, 2006

QQQH vs VYM Performance

NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF (QQQH) is a ETF from NEOS and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QQQH returned +12.86% while VYM returned +26.12%. Year to date, QQQH is up 6.76% versus a gain of 15.80% for VYM.

Over three years, QQQH compounded at +18.45% per year against +18.25% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +7.79% and +12.51% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, QQQH has the edge at +8.59% annualized vs +7.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.6% compared with 13.2% for QQQH. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -31.2% for QQQH and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.49. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.

Fees and Cost Over Time

QQQH charges 0.68% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $68 vs $4 annually, a gap of $64 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQH currently yields 9.56% against 2.86% for VYM.

Holdings Overlap

16.3%overlap

QQQH and VYM share 27 holdings out of 634 unique holdings combined, representing a 16.3% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in QQQHWeight in VYMDifference
AVGO2.98%6.47%3.49%
WMT2.47%2.44%0.03%
CSCO2.06%1.39%0.67%
TXNProProPro
PEPProProPro
AMGNProProPro
ADIProProPro
GILDProProPro
QCOMProProPro
STXProProPro
See all 10 holdings QQQH shares with VYM
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, QQQH or VYM?

QQQH has an expense ratio of 0.68% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $64 per year of difference.

Which performed better, QQQH or VYM?

Over the past year QQQH returned +12.86% vs +26.12% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), QQQH annualized +8.59% vs +7.07% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, QQQH or VYM?

VYM has been the more volatile fund at 14.6% annualized versus 13.2% for QQQH. Worst drawdown: QQQH -31.2% vs VYM -58.8%.

Should I hold both QQQH and VYM?

QQQH and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.49, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between QQQH and VYM?

QQQH and VYM share 27 common holdings with a 16.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 634 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, QQQH or VYM?

QQQH yields 9.56% while VYM yields 2.86%, so QQQH currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →