IVV vs QQQH

Quick Verdict

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns: IVVMore Diversified: IVV

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIVVQQQHWinner
Expense Ratio0.03%0.68%
AUM$865.2B$375M
Dividend Yield1.09%9.56%
Holdings508106
YTD Return+13.31%+6.35%
1Y Return+24.00%+13.41%
3Y Return (annualized)+21.16%+18.21%
5Y Return (annualized)+13.34%+7.69%
Volatility (annualized)15.1%13.2%
Max Drawdown-56.5%-31.2%
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)NEOS
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionMay 15, 2000Nov 8, 2024

IVV vs QQQH Performance

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF (QQQH) is a ETF from NEOS. Over the past year IVV returned +24.00% while QQQH returned +13.41%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.31% versus a gain of 6.35% for QQQH.

Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.16% per year against +18.21% for QQQH; over five years the annualized figures are +13.34% and +7.69% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, QQQH has the edge at +8.53% annualized vs +7.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 13.2% for QQQH. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -31.2% for QQQH. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.76. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IVV charges 0.03% per year while QQQH charges 0.68%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $68 annually, a gap of $65 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 9.56% for QQQH.

Holdings Overlap

53.9%overlap

IVV and QQQH share 87 holdings out of 521 unique holdings combined, representing a 53.9% weight overlap.

High overlap means holding both may not provide much additional diversification.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in IVVWeight in QQQHDifference
AAPL7.44%8.13%0.69%
NVDA7.76%7.78%0.02%
MSFT4.57%4.59%0.02%
AMZNProProPro
MUProProPro
GOOGLProProPro
AVGOProProPro
GOOGProProPro
AMDProProPro
METAProProPro
See all 10 holdings IVV shares with QQQH
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IVV or QQQH?

IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while QQQH charges 0.68%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $65 per year of difference.

Which performed better, IVV or QQQH?

Over the past year IVV returned +24.00% vs +13.41% for QQQH, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), IVV annualized +7.03% vs +8.53% for QQQH. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, IVV or QQQH?

IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 13.2% for QQQH. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs QQQH -31.2%.

Should I hold both IVV and QQQH?

IVV and QQQH have a monthly-return correlation of 0.76, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between IVV and QQQH?

IVV and QQQH share 87 common holdings with a 53.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 521 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or QQQH?

IVV yields 1.09% while QQQH yields 9.56%, so QQQH currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →