QLD vs SCHD

Quick Verdict

SCHD has a lower expense ratio. QLD delivered stronger 1-year returns. QLD offers more diversification with 104 holdings.

Lower Fees: SCHDHigher Returns: QLDMore Diversified: QLD

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricQLDSCHDWinner
Expense Ratio0.95%0.06%
AUM$12.5B$103.7B
Dividend Yield0.12%3.31%
Holdings127104
YTD Return+28.69%+23.53%
1Y Return+46.13%+30.95%
3Y Return (annualized)+40.22%+14.72%
5Y Return (annualized)+18.69%+9.56%
Volatility (annualized)38.1%13.6%
Max Drawdown-84.0%-33.4%
Fund FamilyProSharesCharles Schwab Asset Management
CategoryAlternativeEquity
InceptionJun 19, 2006Oct 20, 2011

QLD vs SCHD Performance

ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) is a ETF from ProShares and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is a ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year QLD returned +46.13% while SCHD returned +30.95%. Year to date, QLD is up 28.69% versus a gain of 23.53% for SCHD.

Over three years, QLD compounded at +40.22% per year against +14.72% for SCHD; over five years the annualized figures are +18.69% and +9.56% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, QLD has the edge at +24.37% annualized vs +11.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

QLD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 38.1% compared with 13.6% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -84.0% for QLD and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.64. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.

Fees and Cost Over Time

QLD charges 0.95% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $6 annually, a gap of $89 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QLD currently yields 0.12% against 3.31% for SCHD.

Holdings Overlap

3.3%overlap

QLD and SCHD share 8 holdings out of 196 unique holdings combined, representing a 3.3% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in QLDWeight in SCHDDifference
AMGN0.56%4.25%3.69%
TXN0.79%3.70%2.91%
PEP0.56%3.72%3.16%
QCOMProProPro
ADPProProPro
CMCSAProProPro
FASTProProPro
PAYXProProPro
See all 8 holdings QLD shares with SCHD
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, QLD or SCHD?

QLD has an expense ratio of 0.95% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $89 per year of difference.

Which performed better, QLD or SCHD?

Over the past year QLD returned +46.13% vs +30.95% for SCHD, so QLD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), QLD annualized +24.37% vs +11.35% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, QLD or SCHD?

QLD has been the more volatile fund at 38.1% annualized versus 13.6% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: QLD -84.0% vs SCHD -33.4%.

Should I hold both QLD and SCHD?

QLD and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.64, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between QLD and SCHD?

QLD and SCHD share 8 common holdings with a 3.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 196 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, QLD or SCHD?

QLD yields 0.12% while SCHD yields 3.31%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →