QLD vs VYM

Quick Verdict

VYM has a lower expense ratio. QLD delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.

Lower Fees: VYMHigher Returns: QLDMore Diversified: VYM

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricQLDVYMWinner
Expense Ratio0.95%0.04%
AUM$12.5B$79.0B
Dividend Yield0.12%2.86%
Holdings127568
YTD Return+28.69%+15.20%
1Y Return+46.13%+25.56%
3Y Return (annualized)+40.22%+17.86%
5Y Return (annualized)+18.69%+12.35%
Volatility (annualized)38.1%14.6%
Max Drawdown-84.0%-58.8%
Fund FamilyProSharesVanguard (US)
CategoryAlternativeEquity
InceptionJun 19, 2006Nov 10, 2006

QLD vs VYM Performance

ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) is a ETF from ProShares and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QLD returned +46.13% while VYM returned +25.56%. Year to date, QLD is up 28.69% versus a gain of 15.20% for VYM.

Over three years, QLD compounded at +40.22% per year against +17.86% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +18.69% and +12.35% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, QLD has the edge at +24.37% annualized vs +7.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

QLD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 38.1% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -84.0% for QLD and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.74. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

QLD charges 0.95% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $4 annually, a gap of $91 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QLD currently yields 0.12% against 2.86% for VYM.

Holdings Overlap

11.6%overlap

QLD and VYM share 27 holdings out of 635 unique holdings combined, representing a 11.6% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in QLDWeight in VYMDifference
AVGO1.83%6.47%4.64%
WMT1.54%2.44%0.90%
CSCO1.28%1.39%0.11%
TXNProProPro
PEPProProPro
AMGNProProPro
ADIProProPro
GILDProProPro
QCOMProProPro
STXProProPro
See all 10 holdings QLD shares with VYM
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, QLD or VYM?

QLD has an expense ratio of 0.95% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $91 per year of difference.

Which performed better, QLD or VYM?

Over the past year QLD returned +46.13% vs +25.56% for VYM, so QLD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), QLD annualized +24.37% vs +7.05% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, QLD or VYM?

QLD has been the more volatile fund at 38.1% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: QLD -84.0% vs VYM -58.8%.

Should I hold both QLD and VYM?

QLD and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.74, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between QLD and VYM?

QLD and VYM share 27 common holdings with a 11.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 635 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, QLD or VYM?

QLD yields 0.12% while VYM yields 2.86%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →