PTIN vs VYM
PTIN vs VYM
Pacer Trendpilot International ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. PTIN delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PTIN | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.67% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $182M | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.17% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 511 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | +14.41% | +13.24% | |
| 1Y Return | +32.16% | +23.76% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +12.32% | +16.97% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +6.60% | +12.26% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.7% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -21.3% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Pacer ETFs | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 2, 2019 | Nov 10, 2006 |
PTIN vs VYM Performance
Pacer Trendpilot International ETF (PTIN) is a ETF from Pacer ETFs and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PTIN returned +32.16% while VYM returned +23.76%. Year to date, PTIN is up 14.41% versus a gain of 13.24% for VYM.
Over three years, PTIN compounded at +12.32% per year against +16.97% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +6.60% and +12.26% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +6.96% annualized vs +6.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.6% compared with 13.7% for PTIN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -21.3% for PTIN and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.68. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PTIN charges 0.67% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $67 vs $4 annually, a gap of $63 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PTIN currently yields 2.17% against 2.86% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
PTIN and VYM share 1 holdings out of 1027 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in PTIN | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| KR | 0.01% | 0.18% | 0.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PTIN or VYM?
PTIN has an expense ratio of 0.67% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $63 per year of difference.
Which performed better, PTIN or VYM?
Over the past year PTIN returned +32.16% vs +23.76% for VYM, so PTIN leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), PTIN annualized +6.92% vs +6.96% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, PTIN or VYM?
VYM has been the more volatile fund at 14.6% annualized versus 13.7% for PTIN. Worst drawdown: PTIN -21.3% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both PTIN and VYM?
PTIN and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.68, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between PTIN and VYM?
PTIN and VYM share 1 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 1027 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, PTIN or VYM?
PTIN yields 2.17% while VYM yields 2.86%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.