PTIN vs QQQ
PTIN vs QQQ
Pacer Trendpilot International ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. PTIN delivered stronger 1-year returns. PTIN offers more diversification with 470 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PTIN | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.67% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $182M | $455.8B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.17% | 0.41% | |
| Holdings | 511 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +14.41% | +12.48% | |
| 1Y Return | +32.16% | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +12.32% | +22.30% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +6.60% | +14.24% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.7% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -21.3% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Pacer ETFs | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 2, 2019 | Mar 10, 1999 |
PTIN vs QQQ Performance
Pacer Trendpilot International ETF (PTIN) is a ETF from Pacer ETFs and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year PTIN returned +32.16% while QQQ returned +22.35%. Year to date, PTIN is up 14.41% versus a gain of 12.48% for QQQ.
Over three years, PTIN compounded at +12.32% per year against +22.30% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +6.60% and +14.24% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +12.91% annualized vs +6.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 13.7% for PTIN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -21.3% for PTIN and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.53. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PTIN charges 0.67% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $67 vs $18 annually, a gap of $49 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PTIN currently yields 2.17% against 0.41% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
PTIN and QQQ share 4 holdings out of 569 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.9% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in PTIN | Weight in QQQ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| SHOP:CA | 0.57% | 0.67% | 0.10% |
| ARM:LN | 0.13% | 0.56% | 0.43% |
| FER:AS | 0.15% | 0.20% | 0.05% |
| TRI:CA | Pro | Pro | Pro |
See all 4 holdings PTIN shares with QQQ Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position. Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime. | |||
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PTIN or QQQ?
PTIN has an expense ratio of 0.67% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $49 per year of difference.
Which performed better, PTIN or QQQ?
Over the past year PTIN returned +32.16% vs +22.35% for QQQ, so PTIN leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), PTIN annualized +6.92% vs +12.91% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, PTIN or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 13.7% for PTIN. Worst drawdown: PTIN -21.3% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both PTIN and QQQ?
PTIN and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.53, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between PTIN and QQQ?
PTIN and QQQ share 4 common holdings with a 0.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 569 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, PTIN or QQQ?
PTIN yields 2.17% while QQQ yields 0.41%, so PTIN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.