PTIN vs SPY
PTIN vs SPY
Pacer Trendpilot International ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust
Quick Verdict
SPY has a lower expense ratio. PTIN delivered stronger 1-year returns. SPY offers more diversification with 503 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PTIN | SPY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.67% | 0.09% | |
| AUM | $182M | $789.1B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.17% | 1.01% | |
| Holdings | 511 | 505 | |
| YTD Return | +14.41% | +9.93% | |
| 1Y Return | +32.16% | +19.50% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +12.32% | +19.33% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +6.60% | +12.82% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.7% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -21.3% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Pacer ETFs | State Street Investment Management | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 2, 2019 | Jan 22, 1993 |
PTIN vs SPY Performance
Pacer Trendpilot International ETF (PTIN) is a ETF from Pacer ETFs and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) is a ETF from State Street Investment Management. Over the past year PTIN returned +32.16% while SPY returned +19.50%. Year to date, PTIN is up 14.41% versus a gain of 9.93% for SPY.
Over three years, PTIN compounded at +12.32% per year against +19.33% for SPY; over five years the annualized figures are +6.60% and +12.82% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, SPY has the edge at +8.74% annualized vs +6.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SPY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 13.7% for PTIN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -21.3% for PTIN and -56.5% for SPY. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.64. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PTIN charges 0.67% per year while SPY charges 0.09%. On a $10,000 position that is $67 vs $9 annually, a gap of $58 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PTIN currently yields 2.17% against 1.01% for SPY.
Holdings Overlap
PTIN and SPY share 1 holdings out of 972 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in PTIN | Weight in SPY | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| KR | 0.01% | 0.05% | 0.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PTIN or SPY?
PTIN has an expense ratio of 0.67% while SPY charges 0.09%. SPY is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $58 per year of difference.
Which performed better, PTIN or SPY?
Over the past year PTIN returned +32.16% vs +19.50% for SPY, so PTIN leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), PTIN annualized +6.92% vs +8.74% for SPY. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, PTIN or SPY?
SPY has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 13.7% for PTIN. Worst drawdown: PTIN -21.3% vs SPY -56.5%.
Should I hold both PTIN and SPY?
PTIN and SPY have a monthly-return correlation of 0.64, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between PTIN and SPY?
PTIN and SPY share 1 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 972 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, PTIN or SPY?
PTIN yields 2.17% while SPY yields 1.01%, so PTIN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.