IVV vs PTIN
IVV vs PTIN
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Pacer Trendpilot International ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. PTIN delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | PTIN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.67% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $182M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 2.17% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 511 | |
| YTD Return | +13.52% | +16.49% | |
| 1Y Return | +23.63% | +33.14% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.26% | +13.55% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.52% | +6.88% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 13.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -21.3% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Pacer ETFs | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | May 2, 2019 |
IVV vs PTIN Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Pacer Trendpilot International ETF (PTIN) is a ETF from Pacer ETFs. Over the past year IVV returned +23.63% while PTIN returned +33.14%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.52% versus a gain of 16.49% for PTIN.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.26% per year against +13.55% for PTIN; over five years the annualized figures are +13.52% and +6.88% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, PTIN has the edge at +7.17% annualized vs +7.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 13.6% for PTIN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -21.3% for PTIN. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.64. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while PTIN charges 0.67%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $67 annually, a gap of $64 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 2.17% for PTIN.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and PTIN share 1 holdings out of 974 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in PTIN | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| KR | 0.05% | 0.01% | 0.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or PTIN?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while PTIN charges 0.67%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $64 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or PTIN?
Over the past year IVV returned +23.63% vs +33.14% for PTIN, so PTIN leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), IVV annualized +7.04% vs +7.17% for PTIN. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or PTIN?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 13.6% for PTIN. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs PTIN -21.3%.
Should I hold both IVV and PTIN?
IVV and PTIN have a monthly-return correlation of 0.64, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and PTIN?
IVV and PTIN share 1 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 974 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or PTIN?
IVV yields 1.09% while PTIN yields 2.17%, so PTIN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.