NBCR vs VTI

Quick Verdict

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns: VTIMore Diversified: VTI

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricNBCRVTIWinner
Expense Ratio0.29%0.03%
AUM$829M$663.5B
Dividend Yield0.43%1.07%
Holdings2113,543
YTD Return+8.44%+11.83%
1Y Return+17.11%+21.79%
3Y Return (annualized)-+20.40%
5Y Return (annualized)-+11.96%
Volatility (annualized)12.6%15.3%
Max Drawdown-18.2%-56.6%
Fund FamilyNeuberger BermanVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionJul 31, 2024May 24, 2001

NBCR vs VTI Performance

Neuberger Berman Core Equity ETF (NBCR) is a ETF from Neuberger Berman and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year NBCR returned +17.11% while VTI returned +21.79%. Year to date, NBCR is up 8.44% versus a gain of 11.83% for VTI.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 12.6% for NBCR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.2% for NBCR and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.99. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

NBCR charges 0.29% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $29 vs $3 annually, a gap of $26 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NBCR currently yields 0.43% against 1.07% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

56.0%overlap

NBCR and VTI share 182 holdings out of 2808 unique holdings combined, representing a 56.0% weight overlap.

High overlap means holding both may not provide much additional diversification.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in NBCRWeight in VTIDifference
NVDA8.02%6.32%1.70%
AAPL6.38%5.84%0.54%
MSFT4.89%3.81%1.08%
AMZNProProPro
GOOGProProPro
AVGOProProPro
METAProProPro
TSLAProProPro
LLYProProPro
AMDProProPro
See all 10 holdings NBCR shares with VTI
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, NBCR or VTI?

NBCR has an expense ratio of 0.29% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $26 per year of difference.

Which performed better, NBCR or VTI?

Over the past year NBCR returned +17.11% vs +21.79% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), NBCR annualized +17.35% vs +8.06% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, NBCR or VTI?

VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 12.6% for NBCR. Worst drawdown: NBCR -18.2% vs VTI -56.6%.

Should I hold both NBCR and VTI?

NBCR and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.99, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.

What is the holdings overlap between NBCR and VTI?

NBCR and VTI share 182 common holdings with a 56.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2808 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, NBCR or VTI?

NBCR yields 0.43% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →