NBCR vs VYM

Quick Verdict

VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.

Lower Fees: VYMHigher Returns: VYMMore Diversified: VYM

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricNBCRVYMWinner
Expense Ratio0.29%0.04%
AUM$829M$79.0B
Dividend Yield0.43%2.86%
Holdings211568
YTD Return+8.44%+13.82%
1Y Return+17.11%+24.08%
3Y Return (annualized)-+17.72%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.13%
Volatility (annualized)12.6%14.6%
Max Drawdown-18.2%-58.8%
Fund FamilyNeuberger BermanVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionJul 31, 2024Nov 10, 2006

NBCR vs VYM Performance

Neuberger Berman Core Equity ETF (NBCR) is a ETF from Neuberger Berman and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year NBCR returned +17.11% while VYM returned +24.08%. Year to date, NBCR is up 8.44% versus a gain of 13.82% for VYM.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.6% compared with 12.6% for NBCR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.2% for NBCR and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.78. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

NBCR charges 0.29% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $29 vs $4 annually, a gap of $25 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NBCR currently yields 0.43% against 2.86% for VYM.

Holdings Overlap

25.2%overlap

NBCR and VYM share 75 holdings out of 690 unique holdings combined, representing a 25.2% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in NBCRWeight in VYMDifference
AVGO3.00%6.47%3.47%
JPM1.27%3.36%2.09%
XOM1.11%2.83%1.72%
JNJProProPro
HDProProPro
PGProProPro
CATProProPro
KOProProPro
MRKProProPro
UNHProProPro
See all 10 holdings NBCR shares with VYM
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, NBCR or VYM?

NBCR has an expense ratio of 0.29% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $25 per year of difference.

Which performed better, NBCR or VYM?

Over the past year NBCR returned +17.11% vs +24.08% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), NBCR annualized +17.35% vs +6.98% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, NBCR or VYM?

VYM has been the more volatile fund at 14.6% annualized versus 12.6% for NBCR. Worst drawdown: NBCR -18.2% vs VYM -58.8%.

Should I hold both NBCR and VYM?

NBCR and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.78, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between NBCR and VYM?

NBCR and VYM share 75 common holdings with a 25.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 690 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, NBCR or VYM?

NBCR yields 0.43% while VYM yields 2.86%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →