MGV vs VTI

Quick Verdict

VTI has a lower expense ratio. MGV delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns: MGVMore Diversified: VTI

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricMGVVTIWinner
Expense Ratio0.05%0.03%
AUM$13.2B$663.5B
Dividend Yield2.26%1.07%
Holdings1233,543
YTD Return+18.07%+13.57%
1Y Return+30.29%+24.23%
3Y Return (annualized)+18.64%+20.73%
5Y Return (annualized)+13.17%+12.24%
Volatility (annualized)15.3%15.3%
Max Drawdown-57.5%-56.6%
Fund FamilyVanguard (US)Vanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionDec 17, 2007May 24, 2001

MGV vs VTI Performance

Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MGV returned +30.29% while VTI returned +24.23%. Year to date, MGV is up 18.07% versus a gain of 13.57% for VTI.

Over three years, MGV compounded at +18.64% per year against +20.73% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +13.17% and +12.24% respectively. Across the full 19-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.12% annualized vs +7.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 15.3% for MGV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -57.5% for MGV and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.93. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

MGV charges 0.05% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $5 vs $3 annually, a gap of $2 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MGV currently yields 2.26% against 1.07% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

30.7%overlap

MGV and VTI share 120 holdings out of 2786 unique holdings combined, representing a 30.7% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in MGVWeight in VTIDifference
MU6.14%1.79%4.35%
JPM3.86%1.11%2.75%
BRK.B3.32%1.24%2.08%
JNJProProPro
XOMProProPro
WMTProProPro
CATProProPro
ABBVProProPro
CSCOProProPro
COSTProProPro
See all 10 holdings MGV shares with VTI
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, MGV or VTI?

MGV has an expense ratio of 0.05% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $2 per year of difference.

Which performed better, MGV or VTI?

Over the past year MGV returned +30.29% vs +24.23% for VTI, so MGV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (19 years), MGV annualized +7.35% vs +8.12% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, MGV or VTI?

VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 15.3% for MGV. Worst drawdown: MGV -57.5% vs VTI -56.6%.

Should I hold both MGV and VTI?

MGV and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.93, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.

What is the holdings overlap between MGV and VTI?

MGV and VTI share 120 common holdings with a 30.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2786 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, MGV or VTI?

MGV yields 2.26% while VTI yields 1.07%, so MGV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →