LTL vs VYM
LTL vs VYM
ProShares Ultra Communication Services vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LTL | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $6M | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.07% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 29 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | -17.28% | +13.24% | |
| 1Y Return | -4.17% | +23.76% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.79% | +16.97% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.31% | +12.26% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 34.2% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -80.7% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 25, 2008 | Nov 10, 2006 |
LTL vs VYM Performance
ProShares Ultra Communication Services (LTL) is a ETF from ProShares and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year LTL returned -4.17% while VYM returned +23.76%. Year to date, LTL is down 17.28% versus a gain of 13.24% for VYM.
Over three years, LTL compounded at +25.79% per year against +16.97% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +14.31% and +12.26% respectively. Across the full 18-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +6.96% annualized vs +5.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
LTL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 34.2% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -80.7% for LTL and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.72. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LTL charges 0.95% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $4 annually, a gap of $91 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LTL currently yields 1.07% against 2.86% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
LTL and VYM share 6 holdings out of 575 unique holdings combined, representing a 2.5% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in LTL | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| VZ | 2.53% | 0.93% | 1.60% |
| T | 2.50% | 0.85% | 1.65% |
| CMCSA | 2.56% | 0.49% | 2.07% |
| OMC | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| FOXA | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| FOX | Pro | Pro | Pro |
See all 6 holdings LTL shares with VYM Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position. Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime. | |||
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LTL or VYM?
LTL has an expense ratio of 0.95% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $91 per year of difference.
Which performed better, LTL or VYM?
Over the past year LTL returned -4.17% vs +23.76% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (18 years), LTL annualized +5.48% vs +6.96% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, LTL or VYM?
LTL has been the more volatile fund at 34.2% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: LTL -80.7% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both LTL and VYM?
LTL and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.72, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between LTL and VYM?
LTL and VYM share 6 common holdings with a 2.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 575 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, LTL or VYM?
LTL yields 1.07% while VYM yields 2.86%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.