IVV vs LTL

Quick Verdict

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns: IVVMore Diversified: IVV

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIVVLTLWinner
Expense Ratio0.03%0.95%
AUM$865.2B$6M
Dividend Yield1.09%1.07%
Holdings50829
YTD Return+13.52%-11.56%
1Y Return+23.63%+1.25%
3Y Return (annualized)+21.26%+29.54%
5Y Return (annualized)+13.52%+15.83%
Volatility (annualized)15.1%34.2%
Max Drawdown-56.5%-80.7%
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)ProShares
CategoryEquityAlternative
InceptionMay 15, 2000Mar 25, 2008

IVV vs LTL Performance

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and ProShares Ultra Communication Services (LTL) is a ETF from ProShares. Over the past year IVV returned +23.63% while LTL returned +1.25%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.52% versus a loss of 11.56% for LTL.

Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.26% per year against +29.54% for LTL; over five years the annualized figures are +13.52% and +15.83% respectively. Across the full 18-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.04% annualized vs +5.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

LTL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 34.2% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -80.7% for LTL. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.76. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IVV charges 0.03% per year while LTL charges 0.95%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $95 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 1.07% for LTL.

Holdings Overlap

9.8%overlap

IVV and LTL share 22 holdings out of 506 unique holdings combined, representing a 9.8% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in IVVWeight in LTLDifference
META2.19%10.56%8.37%
GOOGL3.15%6.67%3.52%
GOOG2.53%5.36%2.83%
NFLXProProPro
TMUSProProPro
DISProProPro
TTWOProProPro
VZProProPro
TProProPro
EAProProPro
See all 10 holdings IVV shares with LTL
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IVV or LTL?

IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while LTL charges 0.95%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $92 per year of difference.

Which performed better, IVV or LTL?

Over the past year IVV returned +23.63% vs +1.25% for LTL, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (18 years), IVV annualized +7.04% vs +5.87% for LTL. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, IVV or LTL?

LTL has been the more volatile fund at 34.2% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs LTL -80.7%.

Should I hold both IVV and LTL?

IVV and LTL have a monthly-return correlation of 0.76, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between IVV and LTL?

IVV and LTL share 22 common holdings with a 9.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 506 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or LTL?

IVV yields 1.09% while LTL yields 1.07%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →