LRGF vs VYM

Quick Verdict

VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.

Lower Fees: VYMHigher Returns: VYMMore Diversified: VYM

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricLRGFVYMWinner
Expense Ratio0.08%0.04%
AUM$3.5B$79.0B
Dividend Yield1.08%2.86%
Holdings298568
YTD Return+13.40%+15.57%
1Y Return+21.15%+25.99%
3Y Return (annualized)+21.63%+18.02%
5Y Return (annualized)+13.99%+12.71%
Volatility (annualized)15.3%14.6%
Max Drawdown-36.0%-58.8%
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)Vanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionApr 28, 2015Nov 10, 2006

LRGF vs VYM Performance

iShares US Equity Factor ETF (LRGF) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year LRGF returned +21.15% while VYM returned +25.99%. Year to date, LRGF is up 13.40% versus a gain of 15.57% for VYM.

Over three years, LRGF compounded at +21.63% per year against +18.02% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +13.99% and +12.71% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, LRGF has the edge at +11.56% annualized vs +7.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

LRGF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -36.0% for LRGF and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.90. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

LRGF charges 0.08% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $8 vs $4 annually, a gap of $4 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LRGF currently yields 1.08% against 2.86% for VYM.

Holdings Overlap

30.2%overlap

LRGF and VYM share 121 holdings out of 728 unique holdings combined, representing a 30.2% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in LRGFWeight in VYMDifference
AVGO2.85%6.47%3.62%
JPM1.53%3.36%1.83%
JNJ1.17%2.62%1.45%
XOMProProPro
WMTProProPro
ABBVProProPro
PGProProPro
CATProProPro
CSCOProProPro
CVXProProPro
See all 10 holdings LRGF shares with VYM
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, LRGF or VYM?

LRGF has an expense ratio of 0.08% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $4 per year of difference.

Which performed better, LRGF or VYM?

Over the past year LRGF returned +21.15% vs +25.99% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), LRGF annualized +11.56% vs +7.07% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, LRGF or VYM?

LRGF has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: LRGF -36.0% vs VYM -58.8%.

Should I hold both LRGF and VYM?

LRGF and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.90, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.

What is the holdings overlap between LRGF and VYM?

LRGF and VYM share 121 common holdings with a 30.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 728 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, LRGF or VYM?

LRGF yields 1.08% while VYM yields 2.86%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →