LRGF vs VOO

Quick Verdict

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.

Lower Fees: VOOHigher Returns: VOOMore Diversified: VOO

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricLRGFVOOWinner
Expense Ratio0.08%0.03%
AUM$3.5B$979.0B
Dividend Yield1.08%1.09%
Holdings298509
YTD Return+13.40%+13.53%
1Y Return+21.15%+23.65%
3Y Return (annualized)+21.63%+21.27%
5Y Return (annualized)+13.99%+13.52%
Volatility (annualized)15.3%14.1%
Max Drawdown-36.0%-34.3%
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)Vanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionApr 28, 2015Sep 7, 2010

LRGF vs VOO Performance

iShares US Equity Factor ETF (LRGF) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year LRGF returned +21.15% while VOO returned +23.65%. Year to date, LRGF is up 13.40% versus a gain of 13.53% for VOO.

Over three years, LRGF compounded at +21.63% per year against +21.27% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +13.99% and +13.52% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.57% annualized vs +11.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

LRGF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -36.0% for LRGF and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.98. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

LRGF charges 0.08% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $8 vs $3 annually, a gap of $5 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LRGF currently yields 1.08% against 1.09% for VOO.

Holdings Overlap

66.8%overlap

LRGF and VOO share 203 holdings out of 593 unique holdings combined, representing a 66.8% weight overlap.

High overlap means holding both may not provide much additional diversification.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in LRGFWeight in VOODifference
NVDA6.88%7.51%0.63%
AAPL6.61%6.59%0.02%
MSFT4.04%4.30%0.26%
GOOGProProPro
AMZNProProPro
AVGOProProPro
GOOGLProProPro
METAProProPro
MUProProPro
TSLAProProPro
See all 10 holdings LRGF shares with VOO
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, LRGF or VOO?

LRGF has an expense ratio of 0.08% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $5 per year of difference.

Which performed better, LRGF or VOO?

Over the past year LRGF returned +21.15% vs +23.65% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), LRGF annualized +11.56% vs +13.57% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, LRGF or VOO?

LRGF has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: LRGF -36.0% vs VOO -34.3%.

Should I hold both LRGF and VOO?

LRGF and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.98, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.

What is the holdings overlap between LRGF and VOO?

LRGF and VOO share 203 common holdings with a 66.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 593 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, LRGF or VOO?

LRGF yields 1.08% while VOO yields 1.09%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →