LRGF vs QQQ

Quick Verdict

LRGF has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. LRGF offers more diversification with 291 holdings.

Lower Fees: LRGFHigher Returns: QQQMore Diversified: LRGF

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricLRGFQQQWinner
Expense Ratio0.08%0.18%
AUM$3.5B$455.8B
Dividend Yield1.08%0.41%
Holdings298108
YTD Return+13.30%+17.27%
1Y Return+21.73%+28.64%
3Y Return (annualized)+21.57%+24.88%
5Y Return (annualized)+13.92%+14.86%
Volatility (annualized)15.3%30.6%
Max Drawdown-36.0%-83.0%
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)Invesco (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionApr 28, 2015Mar 10, 1999

LRGF vs QQQ Performance

iShares US Equity Factor ETF (LRGF) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year LRGF returned +21.73% while QQQ returned +28.64%. Year to date, LRGF is up 13.30% versus a gain of 17.27% for QQQ.

Over three years, LRGF compounded at +21.57% per year against +24.88% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +13.92% and +14.86% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.08% annualized vs +11.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 15.3% for LRGF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -36.0% for LRGF and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.87. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

LRGF charges 0.08% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $8 vs $18 annually, a gap of $10 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LRGF currently yields 1.08% against 0.41% for QQQ.

Holdings Overlap

46.6%overlap

LRGF and QQQ share 56 holdings out of 338 unique holdings combined, representing a 46.6% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in LRGFWeight in QQQDifference
NVDA6.88%7.88%1.00%
AAPL6.61%7.46%0.85%
MSFT4.04%4.65%0.61%
GOOGProProPro
AMZNProProPro
MUProProPro
AVGOProProPro
METAProProPro
AMDProProPro
TSLAProProPro
See all 10 holdings LRGF shares with QQQ
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, LRGF or QQQ?

LRGF has an expense ratio of 0.08% while QQQ charges 0.18%. LRGF is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $10 per year of difference.

Which performed better, LRGF or QQQ?

Over the past year LRGF returned +21.73% vs +28.64% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), LRGF annualized +11.55% vs +13.08% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, LRGF or QQQ?

QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 15.3% for LRGF. Worst drawdown: LRGF -36.0% vs QQQ -83.0%.

Should I hold both LRGF and QQQ?

LRGF and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.87, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between LRGF and QQQ?

LRGF and QQQ share 56 common holdings with a 46.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 338 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, LRGF or QQQ?

LRGF yields 1.08% while QQQ yields 0.41%, so LRGF currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →