IWR vs VTI

Quick Verdict

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns: VTIMore Diversified: VTI

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIWRVTIWinner
Expense Ratio0.18%0.03%
AUM$56.1B$663.5B
Dividend Yield1.15%1.07%
Holdings8313,543
YTD Return+16.66%+13.92%
1Y Return+21.96%+24.07%
3Y Return (annualized)+16.41%+20.88%
5Y Return (annualized)+8.70%+12.47%
Volatility (annualized)17.0%15.3%
Max Drawdown-59.7%-56.6%
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)Vanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionJul 17, 2001May 24, 2001

IWR vs VTI Performance

iShares Russell Mid-Cap ETF (IWR) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year IWR returned +21.96% while VTI returned +24.07%. Year to date, IWR is up 16.66% versus a gain of 13.92% for VTI.

Over three years, IWR compounded at +16.41% per year against +20.88% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +8.70% and +12.47% respectively. Across the full 25-year window we track, IWR has the edge at +8.78% annualized vs +8.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

IWR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.0% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -59.7% for IWR and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.96. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IWR charges 0.18% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $3 annually, a gap of $15 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IWR currently yields 1.15% against 1.07% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

15.2%overlap

IWR and VTI share 618 holdings out of 2963 unique holdings combined, representing a 15.2% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in IWRWeight in VTIDifference
HOOD0.65%0.11%0.54%
SNOW0.63%0.12%0.51%
DDOG0.60%0.12%0.48%
NETProProPro
MPCProProPro
RCLProProPro
SPGProProPro
PSXProProPro
URIProProPro
ALABProProPro
See all 10 holdings IWR shares with VTI
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IWR or VTI?

IWR has an expense ratio of 0.18% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $15 per year of difference.

Which performed better, IWR or VTI?

Over the past year IWR returned +21.96% vs +24.07% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (25 years), IWR annualized +8.78% vs +8.13% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, IWR or VTI?

IWR has been the more volatile fund at 17.0% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: IWR -59.7% vs VTI -56.6%.

Should I hold both IWR and VTI?

IWR and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.96, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.

What is the holdings overlap between IWR and VTI?

IWR and VTI share 618 common holdings with a 15.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2963 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, IWR or VTI?

IWR yields 1.15% while VTI yields 1.07%, so IWR currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →