IWR vs VOO

Quick Verdict

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. IWR offers more diversification with 798 holdings.

Lower Fees: VOOHigher Returns: VOOMore Diversified: IWR

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIWRVOOWinner
Expense Ratio0.18%0.03%
AUM$56.1B$979.0B
Dividend Yield1.15%1.09%
Holdings831509
YTD Return+16.85%+13.80%
1Y Return+22.97%+23.71%
3Y Return (annualized)+16.74%+21.50%
5Y Return (annualized)+8.57%+13.44%
Volatility (annualized)17.0%14.1%
Max Drawdown-59.7%-34.3%
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)Vanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionJul 17, 2001Sep 7, 2010

IWR vs VOO Performance

iShares Russell Mid-Cap ETF (IWR) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year IWR returned +22.97% while VOO returned +23.71%. Year to date, IWR is up 16.85% versus a gain of 13.80% for VOO.

Over three years, IWR compounded at +16.74% per year against +21.50% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +8.57% and +13.44% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.58% annualized vs +8.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

IWR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.0% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -59.7% for IWR and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.94. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IWR charges 0.18% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $3 annually, a gap of $15 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IWR currently yields 1.15% against 1.09% for VOO.

Holdings Overlap

13.1%overlap

IWR and VOO share 298 holdings out of 1005 unique holdings combined, representing a 13.1% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in IWRWeight in VOODifference
HOOD0.65%0.12%0.53%
DDOG0.60%0.13%0.47%
MPC0.57%0.12%0.45%
RCLProProPro
SPGProProPro
PSXProProPro
URIProProPro
FIXProProPro
ALLProProPro
WBDProProPro
See all 10 holdings IWR shares with VOO
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IWR or VOO?

IWR has an expense ratio of 0.18% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $15 per year of difference.

Which performed better, IWR or VOO?

Over the past year IWR returned +22.97% vs +23.71% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), IWR annualized +8.78% vs +13.58% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, IWR or VOO?

IWR has been the more volatile fund at 17.0% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: IWR -59.7% vs VOO -34.3%.

Should I hold both IWR and VOO?

IWR and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.94, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.

What is the holdings overlap between IWR and VOO?

IWR and VOO share 298 common holdings with a 13.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 1005 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, IWR or VOO?

IWR yields 1.15% while VOO yields 1.09%, so IWR currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →