IWP vs VXUS
IWP vs VXUS
iShares Russell Midcap Growth ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7860 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IWP | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.23% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $19.8B | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.34% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 271 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | -0.69% | +11.13% | |
| 1Y Return | -2.95% | +27.13% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +11.94% | +17.24% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +4.23% | +8.71% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.5% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -57.3% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 17, 2001 | Jan 26, 2011 |
IWP vs VXUS Performance
iShares Russell Midcap Growth ETF (IWP) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year IWP returned -2.95% while VXUS returned +27.13%. Year to date, IWP is down 0.69% versus a gain of 11.13% for VXUS.
Over three years, IWP compounded at +11.94% per year against +17.24% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +4.23% and +8.71% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, IWP has the edge at +8.46% annualized vs +4.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IWP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.5% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -57.3% for IWP and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.77. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IWP charges 0.23% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $23 vs $5 annually, a gap of $18 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IWP currently yields 0.34% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
IWP and VXUS share 1 holdings out of 8126 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IWP | Weight in VXUS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| QSR:CA | 0.40% | 0.05% | 0.35% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IWP or VXUS?
IWP has an expense ratio of 0.23% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $18 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IWP or VXUS?
Over the past year IWP returned -2.95% vs +27.13% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), IWP annualized +8.46% vs +4.66% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IWP or VXUS?
IWP has been the more volatile fund at 18.5% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: IWP -57.3% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both IWP and VXUS?
IWP and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.77, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IWP and VXUS?
IWP and VXUS share 1 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 8126 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IWP or VXUS?
IWP yields 0.34% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.