IVV vs IWP

Quick Verdict

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns: IVVMore Diversified: IVV

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIVVIWPWinner
Expense Ratio0.03%0.23%
AUM$865.2B$19.8B
Dividend Yield1.09%0.34%
Holdings508271
YTD Return+9.93%-0.69%
1Y Return+19.59%-2.95%
3Y Return (annualized)+19.41%+11.94%
5Y Return (annualized)+12.89%+4.23%
Volatility (annualized)15.1%18.5%
Max Drawdown-56.5%-57.3%
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)iShares by BlackRock (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionMay 15, 2000Jul 17, 2001

IVV vs IWP Performance

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and iShares Russell Midcap Growth ETF (IWP) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year IVV returned +19.59% while IWP returned -2.95%. Year to date, IVV is up 9.93% versus a loss of 0.69% for IWP.

Over three years, IVV compounded at +19.41% per year against +11.94% for IWP; over five years the annualized figures are +12.89% and +4.23% respectively. Across the full 25-year window we track, IWP has the edge at +8.46% annualized vs +6.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

IWP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.5% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -57.3% for IWP. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IVV charges 0.03% per year while IWP charges 0.23%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $23 annually, a gap of $20 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 0.34% for IWP.

Holdings Overlap

4.6%overlap

IVV and IWP share 83 holdings out of 689 unique holdings combined, representing a 4.6% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in IVVWeight in IWPDifference
DDOG0.13%2.33%2.20%
HOOD0.13%2.08%1.95%
SPG0.11%2.00%1.89%
FIXProProPro
TERProProPro
TRGPProProPro
CORProProPro
VSTProProPro
LITEProProPro
GWWProProPro
See all 10 holdings IVV shares with IWP
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IVV or IWP?

IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while IWP charges 0.23%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $20 per year of difference.

Which performed better, IVV or IWP?

Over the past year IVV returned +19.59% vs -2.95% for IWP, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (25 years), IVV annualized +6.91% vs +8.46% for IWP. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, IVV or IWP?

IWP has been the more volatile fund at 18.5% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs IWP -57.3%.

Should I hold both IVV and IWP?

IVV and IWP have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.

What is the holdings overlap between IVV and IWP?

IVV and IWP share 83 common holdings with a 4.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 689 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or IWP?

IVV yields 1.09% while IWP yields 0.34%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →