IWP vs QQQ

Quick Verdict

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. IWP offers more diversification with 267 holdings.

Lower Fees: QQQHigher Returns: QQQMore Diversified: IWP

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIWPQQQWinner
Expense Ratio0.23%0.18%
AUM$19.8B$455.8B
Dividend Yield0.34%0.41%
Holdings271108
YTD Return+1.39%+14.45%
1Y Return-1.34%+24.70%
3Y Return (annualized)+13.77%+24.19%
5Y Return (annualized)+4.55%+14.49%
Volatility (annualized)18.5%30.6%
Max Drawdown-57.3%-83.0%
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)Invesco (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionJul 17, 2001Mar 10, 1999

IWP vs QQQ Performance

iShares Russell Midcap Growth ETF (IWP) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year IWP returned -1.34% while QQQ returned +24.70%. Year to date, IWP is up 1.39% versus a gain of 14.45% for QQQ.

Over three years, IWP compounded at +13.77% per year against +24.19% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +4.55% and +14.49% respectively. Across the full 25-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +12.98% annualized vs +8.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 18.5% for IWP. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -57.3% for IWP and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.89. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IWP charges 0.23% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $23 vs $18 annually, a gap of $5 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IWP currently yields 0.34% against 0.41% for QQQ.

Holdings Overlap

3.5%overlap

IWP and QQQ share 17 holdings out of 353 unique holdings combined, representing a 3.5% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in IWPWeight in QQQDifference
DDOG2.33%0.38%1.95%
ALAB1.84%0.27%1.57%
TER1.65%0.24%1.41%
LITEProProPro
RKLBProProPro
AXONProProPro
TTWOProProPro
FASTProProPro
MCHPProProPro
ADSKProProPro
See all 10 holdings IWP shares with QQQ
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IWP or QQQ?

IWP has an expense ratio of 0.23% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $5 per year of difference.

Which performed better, IWP or QQQ?

Over the past year IWP returned -1.34% vs +24.70% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (25 years), IWP annualized +8.54% vs +12.98% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, IWP or QQQ?

QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 18.5% for IWP. Worst drawdown: IWP -57.3% vs QQQ -83.0%.

Should I hold both IWP and QQQ?

IWP and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.89, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between IWP and QQQ?

IWP and QQQ share 17 common holdings with a 3.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 353 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, IWP or QQQ?

IWP yields 0.34% while QQQ yields 0.41%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →