IVV vs TYLG

Quick Verdict

IVV has a lower expense ratio. TYLG delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns: TYLGMore Diversified: IVV

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIVVTYLGWinner
Expense Ratio0.03%0.60%
AUM$865.2B$14M
Dividend Yield1.09%7.86%
Holdings50877
YTD Return+13.52%+21.48%
1Y Return+23.63%+34.55%
3Y Return (annualized)+21.26%+22.84%
5Y Return (annualized)+13.52%-
Volatility (annualized)15.1%15.8%
Max Drawdown-56.5%-24.5%
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)Global X by mirae Asset
CategoryEquityAlternative
InceptionMay 15, 2000Nov 21, 2022

IVV vs TYLG Performance

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF (TYLG) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset. Over the past year IVV returned +23.63% while TYLG returned +34.55%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.52% versus a gain of 21.48% for TYLG.

Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.26% per year against +22.84% for TYLG. Across the full 4-year window we track, TYLG has the edge at +25.55% annualized vs +7.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

TYLG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.8% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -24.5% for TYLG. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.84. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IVV charges 0.03% per year while TYLG charges 0.60%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $60 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 7.86% for TYLG.

Holdings Overlap

5.7%overlap

IVV and TYLG share 56 holdings out of 508 unique holdings combined, representing a 5.7% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in IVVWeight in TYLGDifference
WDC0.29%53.65%53.36%
NVDA7.76%0.07%7.69%
AAPL7.44%0.07%7.37%
STXProProPro
APHProProPro
MSFTProProPro
GLWProProPro
AVGOProProPro
QCOMProProPro
ADIProProPro
See all 10 holdings IVV shares with TYLG
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IVV or TYLG?

IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while TYLG charges 0.60%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $57 per year of difference.

Which performed better, IVV or TYLG?

Over the past year IVV returned +23.63% vs +34.55% for TYLG, so TYLG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), IVV annualized +7.04% vs +25.55% for TYLG. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, IVV or TYLG?

TYLG has been the more volatile fund at 15.8% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs TYLG -24.5%.

Should I hold both IVV and TYLG?

IVV and TYLG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.84, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between IVV and TYLG?

IVV and TYLG share 56 common holdings with a 5.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 508 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or TYLG?

IVV yields 1.09% while TYLG yields 7.86%, so TYLG currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →