TYLG vs VYM

Quick Verdict

VYM has a lower expense ratio. TYLG delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.

Lower Fees: VYMHigher Returns: TYLGMore Diversified: VYM

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricTYLGVYMWinner
Expense Ratio0.60%0.04%
AUM$14M$79.0B
Dividend Yield7.86%2.86%
Holdings77568
YTD Return+22.17%+15.80%
1Y Return+35.11%+26.12%
3Y Return (annualized)+23.32%+18.25%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.51%
Volatility (annualized)15.8%14.6%
Max Drawdown-24.5%-58.8%
Fund FamilyGlobal X by mirae AssetVanguard (US)
CategoryAlternativeEquity
InceptionNov 21, 2022Nov 10, 2006

TYLG vs VYM Performance

Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF (TYLG) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year TYLG returned +35.11% while VYM returned +26.12%. Year to date, TYLG is up 22.17% versus a gain of 15.80% for VYM.

Over three years, TYLG compounded at +23.32% per year against +18.25% for VYM. Across the full 4-year window we track, TYLG has the edge at +25.68% annualized vs +7.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

TYLG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.8% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -24.5% for TYLG and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.39. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.

Fees and Cost Over Time

TYLG charges 0.60% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $4 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, TYLG currently yields 7.86% against 2.86% for VYM.

Holdings Overlap

3.5%overlap

TYLG and VYM share 13 holdings out of 604 unique holdings combined, representing a 3.5% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in TYLGWeight in VYMDifference
STX6.93%0.38%6.55%
AVGO0.06%6.47%6.41%
GLW4.02%0.51%3.51%
ADIProProPro
QCOMProProPro
DELLProProPro
CSCOProProPro
ACNProProPro
IBMProProPro
TXNProProPro
See all 10 holdings TYLG shares with VYM
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, TYLG or VYM?

TYLG has an expense ratio of 0.60% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $56 per year of difference.

Which performed better, TYLG or VYM?

Over the past year TYLG returned +35.11% vs +26.12% for VYM, so TYLG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), TYLG annualized +25.68% vs +7.07% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, TYLG or VYM?

TYLG has been the more volatile fund at 15.8% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: TYLG -24.5% vs VYM -58.8%.

Should I hold both TYLG and VYM?

TYLG and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.39, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between TYLG and VYM?

TYLG and VYM share 13 common holdings with a 3.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 604 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, TYLG or VYM?

TYLG yields 7.86% while VYM yields 2.86%, so TYLG currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →