TYLG vs VXUS
TYLG vs VXUS
Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. TYLG delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7860 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | TYLG | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $14M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 7.86% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 77 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +21.48% | +13.57% | |
| 1Y Return | +34.55% | +28.78% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.84% | +18.63% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.05% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.8% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -24.5% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 21, 2022 | Jan 26, 2011 |
TYLG vs VXUS Performance
Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF (TYLG) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year TYLG returned +34.55% while VXUS returned +28.78%. Year to date, TYLG is up 21.48% versus a gain of 13.57% for VXUS.
Over three years, TYLG compounded at +22.84% per year against +18.63% for VXUS. Across the full 4-year window we track, TYLG has the edge at +25.55% annualized vs +4.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
TYLG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.8% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -24.5% for TYLG and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.52. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
TYLG charges 0.60% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $5 annually, a gap of $55 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, TYLG currently yields 7.86% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
TYLG and VXUS share 2 holdings out of 7917 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, TYLG or VXUS?
TYLG has an expense ratio of 0.60% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $55 per year of difference.
Which performed better, TYLG or VXUS?
Over the past year TYLG returned +34.55% vs +28.78% for VXUS, so TYLG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), TYLG annualized +25.55% vs +4.80% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, TYLG or VXUS?
TYLG has been the more volatile fund at 15.8% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: TYLG -24.5% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both TYLG and VXUS?
TYLG and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.52, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between TYLG and VXUS?
TYLG and VXUS share 2 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7917 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, TYLG or VXUS?
TYLG yields 7.86% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so TYLG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.