IVV vs MCDS
IVV vs MCDS
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Mid Core ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. MCDS delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | MCDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.35% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $8M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 1.28% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 189 | |
| YTD Return | +13.80% | +17.72% | |
| 1Y Return | +23.70% | +24.68% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.49% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.43% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 13.0% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -22.5% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Aug 7, 2024 |
IVV vs MCDS Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Mid Core ETF (MCDS) is a ETF from J.P. Morgan Asset Management. Over the past year IVV returned +23.70% while MCDS returned +24.68%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.80% versus a gain of 17.72% for MCDS.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 13.0% for MCDS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -22.5% for MCDS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.79. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while MCDS charges 0.35%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $35 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 1.28% for MCDS.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and MCDS share 117 holdings out of 574 unique holdings combined, representing a 7.6% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in MCDS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| WDC | 0.29% | 2.31% | 2.02% |
| HWM | 0.17% | 1.49% | 1.32% |
| PWR | 0.15% | 1.31% | 1.16% |
| HLT | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| STT | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| MPC | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| HPE | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| TER | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| ROST | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| WAB | Pro | Pro | Pro |
See all 10 holdings IVV shares with MCDS Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position. Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime. | |||
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or MCDS?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while MCDS charges 0.35%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $32 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or MCDS?
Over the past year IVV returned +23.70% vs +24.68% for MCDS, so MCDS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), IVV annualized +7.05% vs +17.92% for MCDS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or MCDS?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 13.0% for MCDS. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs MCDS -22.5%.
Should I hold both IVV and MCDS?
IVV and MCDS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.79, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and MCDS?
IVV and MCDS share 117 common holdings with a 7.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 574 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or MCDS?
IVV yields 1.09% while MCDS yields 1.28%, so MCDS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.