MCDS vs VYM
MCDS vs VYM
JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Mid Core ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MCDS | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $8M | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.28% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 189 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | +17.72% | +15.80% | |
| 1Y Return | +24.68% | +26.12% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +18.25% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.51% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.0% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -22.5% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 7, 2024 | Nov 10, 2006 |
MCDS vs VYM Performance
JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Mid Core ETF (MCDS) is a ETF from J.P. Morgan Asset Management and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MCDS returned +24.68% while VYM returned +26.12%. Year to date, MCDS is up 17.72% versus a gain of 15.80% for VYM.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.6% compared with 13.0% for MCDS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.5% for MCDS and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.84. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MCDS charges 0.35% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $4 annually, a gap of $31 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MCDS currently yields 1.28% against 2.86% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
MCDS and VYM share 53 holdings out of 691 unique holdings combined, representing a 7.5% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in MCDS | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MPC | 1.16% | 0.26% | 0.90% |
| STT | 1.23% | 0.16% | 1.07% |
| GLW | 0.81% | 0.51% | 0.30% |
| HPE | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| CAH | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| ETR | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| MTB | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| XEL | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| CMS | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| NTRS | Pro | Pro | Pro |
See all 10 holdings MCDS shares with VYM Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position. Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime. | |||
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MCDS or VYM?
MCDS has an expense ratio of 0.35% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $31 per year of difference.
Which performed better, MCDS or VYM?
Over the past year MCDS returned +24.68% vs +26.12% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), MCDS annualized +17.92% vs +7.07% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, MCDS or VYM?
VYM has been the more volatile fund at 14.6% annualized versus 13.0% for MCDS. Worst drawdown: MCDS -22.5% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both MCDS and VYM?
MCDS and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.84, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between MCDS and VYM?
MCDS and VYM share 53 common holdings with a 7.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 691 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, MCDS or VYM?
MCDS yields 1.28% while VYM yields 2.86%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.