IQM vs VTI

Quick Verdict

VTI has a lower expense ratio. IQM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns: IQMMore Diversified: VTI

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIQMVTIWinner
Expense Ratio0.50%0.03%
AUM$97M$663.5B
Dividend Yield0.00%1.07%
Holdings783,543
YTD Return+20.98%+14.20%
1Y Return+34.66%+24.16%
3Y Return (annualized)+32.10%+21.12%
5Y Return (annualized)+16.72%+12.37%
Volatility (annualized)28.6%15.3%
Max Drawdown-44.9%-56.6%
Fund FamilyFranklin Templeton Investments (US)Vanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionFeb 25, 2020May 24, 2001

IQM vs VTI Performance

Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF (IQM) is a ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year IQM returned +34.66% while VTI returned +24.16%. Year to date, IQM is up 20.98% versus a gain of 14.20% for VTI.

Over three years, IQM compounded at +32.10% per year against +21.12% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +16.72% and +12.37% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, IQM has the edge at +26.05% annualized vs +8.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

IQM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 28.6% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -44.9% for IQM and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.87. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IQM charges 0.50% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $3 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IQM currently yields 0.00% against 1.07% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

6.2%overlap

IQM and VTI share 9 holdings out of 2788 unique holdings combined, representing a 6.2% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in IQMWeight in VTIDifference
AAPL3.06%5.84%2.78%
GEV3.31%0.43%2.88%
BE3.40%0.11%3.29%
AMATProProPro
AMDProProPro
APHProProPro
NETProProPro
AEISProProPro
ADIProProPro
See all 9 holdings IQM shares with VTI
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IQM or VTI?

IQM has an expense ratio of 0.50% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $47 per year of difference.

Which performed better, IQM or VTI?

Over the past year IQM returned +34.66% vs +24.16% for VTI, so IQM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), IQM annualized +26.05% vs +8.14% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, IQM or VTI?

IQM has been the more volatile fund at 28.6% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: IQM -44.9% vs VTI -56.6%.

Should I hold both IQM and VTI?

IQM and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.87, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between IQM and VTI?

IQM and VTI share 9 common holdings with a 6.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2788 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, IQM or VTI?

IQM yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →