IMTM vs SCHD
IMTM vs SCHD
iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Quick Verdict
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD delivered stronger 1-year returns. IMTM offers more diversification with 297 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IMTM | SCHD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.30% | 0.06% | |
| AUM | $4.1B | $103.7B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.36% | 3.31% | |
| Holdings | 326 | 104 | |
| YTD Return | +10.43% | +23.31% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.34% | +30.42% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.02% | +14.66% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.87% | +9.59% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.8% | 13.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -30.7% | -33.4% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Charles Schwab Asset Management | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 13, 2015 | Oct 20, 2011 |
IMTM vs SCHD Performance
iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF (IMTM) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is a ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year IMTM returned +22.34% while SCHD returned +30.42%. Year to date, IMTM is up 10.43% versus a gain of 23.31% for SCHD.
Over three years, IMTM compounded at +21.02% per year against +14.66% for SCHD; over five years the annualized figures are +9.87% and +9.59% respectively. Across the full 12-year window we track, SCHD has the edge at +11.34% annualized vs +8.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IMTM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.8% compared with 13.6% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -30.7% for IMTM and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.74. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IMTM charges 0.30% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $30 vs $6 annually, a gap of $24 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IMTM currently yields 4.36% against 3.31% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
IMTM and SCHD share 0 holdings out of 397 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IMTM or SCHD?
IMTM has an expense ratio of 0.30% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $24 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IMTM or SCHD?
Over the past year IMTM returned +22.34% vs +30.42% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (12 years), IMTM annualized +8.06% vs +11.34% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IMTM or SCHD?
IMTM has been the more volatile fund at 13.8% annualized versus 13.6% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: IMTM -30.7% vs SCHD -33.4%.
Should I hold both IMTM and SCHD?
IMTM and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.74, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IMTM and SCHD?
IMTM and SCHD share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 397 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IMTM or SCHD?
IMTM yields 4.36% while SCHD yields 3.31%, so IMTM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.