IMTM vs IVV
IMTM vs IVV
iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IMTM | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.30% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $4.1B | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.36% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 326 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +10.11% | +13.52% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.12% | +23.63% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.93% | +21.26% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.86% | +13.52% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.8% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -30.7% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 13, 2015 | May 15, 2000 |
IMTM vs IVV Performance
iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF (IMTM) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year IMTM returned +22.12% while IVV returned +23.63%. Year to date, IMTM is up 10.11% versus a gain of 13.52% for IVV.
Over three years, IMTM compounded at +20.93% per year against +21.26% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +9.86% and +13.52% respectively. Across the full 12-year window we track, IMTM has the edge at +8.04% annualized vs +7.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 13.8% for IMTM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -30.7% for IMTM and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.83. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IMTM charges 0.30% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $30 vs $3 annually, a gap of $27 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IMTM currently yields 4.36% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IMTM or IVV?
IMTM has an expense ratio of 0.30% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $27 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IMTM or IVV?
Over the past year IMTM returned +22.12% vs +23.63% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (12 years), IMTM annualized +8.04% vs +7.04% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IMTM or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 13.8% for IMTM. Worst drawdown: IMTM -30.7% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both IMTM and IVV?
IMTM and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.83, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IMTM and IVV?
IMTM and IVV share 2 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 800 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IMTM or IVV?
IMTM yields 4.36% while IVV yields 1.09%, so IMTM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.