IMCG vs VOO

Quick Verdict

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.

Lower Fees: VOOHigher Returns: VOOMore Diversified: VOO

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIMCGVOOWinner
Expense Ratio0.06%0.03%
AUM$4.0B$979.0B
Dividend Yield0.61%1.09%
Holdings265509
YTD Return+22.13%+13.31%
1Y Return+22.31%+24.01%
3Y Return (annualized)+17.89%+21.17%
5Y Return (annualized)+7.54%+13.34%
Volatility (annualized)17.9%14.1%
Max Drawdown-59.0%-34.3%
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)Vanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionJun 28, 2004Sep 7, 2010

IMCG vs VOO Performance

iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IMCG) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year IMCG returned +22.31% while VOO returned +24.01%. Year to date, IMCG is up 22.13% versus a gain of 13.31% for VOO.

Over three years, IMCG compounded at +17.89% per year against +21.17% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +7.54% and +13.34% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.55% annualized vs +11.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

IMCG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.9% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -59.0% for IMCG and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IMCG charges 0.06% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $6 vs $3 annually, a gap of $3 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IMCG currently yields 0.61% against 1.09% for VOO.

Holdings Overlap

12.3%overlap

IMCG and VOO share 184 holdings out of 582 unique holdings combined, representing a 12.3% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in IMCGWeight in VOODifference
FTNT1.34%0.15%1.19%
CMI1.24%0.15%1.09%
HOOD1.21%0.12%1.09%
FCXProProPro
JCIProProPro
DELLProProPro
DDOGProProPro
AONProProPro
HLTProProPro
MCOProProPro
See all 10 holdings IMCG shares with VOO
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IMCG or VOO?

IMCG has an expense ratio of 0.06% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $3 per year of difference.

Which performed better, IMCG or VOO?

Over the past year IMCG returned +22.31% vs +24.01% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), IMCG annualized +11.23% vs +13.55% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, IMCG or VOO?

IMCG has been the more volatile fund at 17.9% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: IMCG -59.0% vs VOO -34.3%.

Should I hold both IMCG and VOO?

IMCG and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.

What is the holdings overlap between IMCG and VOO?

IMCG and VOO share 184 common holdings with a 12.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 582 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, IMCG or VOO?

IMCG yields 0.61% while VOO yields 1.09%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →